
Dan Conrad is a valued friend. He can always be trusted to be thoughtful and to offer honest opinions. He is a national pioneer in service learning. He managed to get his name on Nixon's "Enemies List" and become #54 of George H.W. Bush's "Thousand Points of Light". His eclectic taste in literature is matched by the variety of his skills. He came later in life to basketball coaching than nearly any coach and recently produced his first iMovie. He claims to be so busy in retirement that he hasn't a clue about how he had time to teach in the good old days.
| "My best-loved advantage of retirement is coming on to 10 or 11 PM and not having tests to correct or lessons to prepare for the next day! That's a pleasure the leisured aristocrats chronicled by Austin, Wharton, James, et al. could neither experience nor appreciate. |
| "Of course I came to this leisure quite unprepared. Who wouldn't have after spending 30 years in a setting where the phrase 'free time' evokes shudders and where the powers that be spend most of their own time devising ever more enforceable ways to insure that the staff and students never face its temptations. |
| "But I'm learning. So far my free time has not led to the debauchery I fantasized nor the enrichment my conscience said I should seek. But I have done more reading for pleasure and have a few thoughts from that that may be of use to others. |
| "First, a quick note that is decidedly not useful but which I cannot resist including. |
| "Two years of increased reading has only deepened my prejudice that the art of writing serious literature reached a kind of apex in the late 19th century and is still declining. Oh, for the days when not only did boy not get girl, and good was not rewarded, and the lessons learned came too late -- but it mattered, it was tragic that things should be so! Check Hardy and Dickens for starters. |
| "Now, to be just a smidgen more practical, here are suggestions in some categories devised from fiction I've read of late. |
|
|
|
|
| "You might have some luck with Henry James and E. M. Forster (where at least lessons are learned). For an almost sure bet, try Jane Austin. Avoid Balzac and all Russians. |
| "The least enjoyable book of the last two (or any) years: Moby Dick. Those who deem this a classic must have only seen the movie. The book itself buries a pretty good 30-page story inside 250 pages of outdated, doubtful, irrelevant, uninteresting and increasingly irritating 'facts' about whales and whaling. The movie was actually pretty good. (Sorry, I really did mean to be practical, but got carried away. I will focus now.) |
| "The modern mystery writer who is so good I bought her latest novel in hardcover the day it came out (the only mystery I've ever bought in hardcover): Batya Gur. Ms Gur lives in Jerusalem and this is her fourth book. |
| "In each her erudite detective must master the intricacies and idiosyncrasies of some social setting in order to solve the crime. Of course, we learn along with him. In Literary Murder, it's the English department of a major university; in Saturday Morning Murders, it's an institute for training psychoanalysts; in Murder on a Kibbutz -- you guessed it. The latest, A Murder Duet, involves the world of classical music, musicians, and conductors. I think I'm in love with her. |
| "What to read if you love to read about reading and can't wait for Reading: A free catalog, A Common Reader: Books for Readers with Imagination. |
| "It's a more or less monthly catalog in the sense that you can order any of the hundred or so books mentioned. |
| "It's not, in the sense that every book is described in a brief and personal essay that collectively make it as interesting as any magazine I get. |
| "Books range from old classics to 'forgotten-but-should-have-been-classics' to current serious fiction and nonfiction to some that would otherwise only be available in a London bookstore. |
| "I at least skim every issue the day it arrives. I buy from it at times to be sure it keeps coming -- or when they mention books not carried by local bookstores (or anyplace). |
| "Write for their catalog at A Common Reader, 141 Tompkins Avenue, Pleasantville, NY 10570-3154. Or call 1-800-832-7323. Or check out its web site. |
| "What to read about reading if you can't wait for Reading or A Common Reader log on to Cyber Editions. |
| "I've made it my home page. |
| "Partly because I like to skim the essays and reviews posted daily (on art, music, philosophy, literature, etc.) and even more because they provide links to a huge array of interesting sites from The London Times and Lingua Franca to Mother Jones and The Onion (a satirical newspaper from Madison, Wisconsin) to major domestic newspapers and magazines to cartoons by Feiffer and columns by Molly Ivins and Roger Ebert and on and on. |
| "Their selection of essays is irritatingly conservative, but you can easily avoid those and enjoy the links." |
A few months later, Dan offered this reflection on Batya Gur and others.
| "This is old news, but it's a nagging irritation in the back of my mind. The last contribution I sent to Reading included a line something like '...and the only mystery writer whose work I look forward to enough to purchase it in hardcover when it first comes out is an Israeli literature professor named Batya Gur.' |
| "Well, wouldn't you know I bought her latest book last fall and thought it was terrible, a complete reversal from her earlier books, being now full of all the stuff I dislike in mystery novels (way, way too much on a poorly imagined personal life of the detective, boring but space-filling conflicts with the PR hungry supervisor, etc., ad nauseum). |
| "Oh well, lesson learned. Back to the library. By the way another previously good mystery writer fell into the same trap, Arturo PÈrez-Reverte, the guy who wrote Flanders Panel (and another good one) into which he wove seamlessly interesting information about some esoteric subculture. |
| "But the Fencing Master was all about fencing and the love life of the fencing master with no hint of a mystery up to about page 100 when I gave it up. |
| "Is there a literary Peter Principle in which writers who might be pretty good in one genre suddenly think they can write like George Elliot and turn out crap instead?" |
Most recently, Dan reacted to my seconding of Dale Stahl's recommendation of a modern mystery.
| "In the last issue you seconded a recommendation by Dale Stahl of the mystery: A Small Death in Lisbon. |
| "Now when two respected friends praise a book you can't go wrong. Wrong. |
| "I hated it. I ploughed through more than a hundred pages before heaving it across the room. |
| "I don't much like comprehending the world through the mind of a Nazi; I like sex less explicit; violence less graphic and frequent. |
| "I'm a nineteenth century kind of reader to whom the worldliness of Sue, in Hardy's Jude the Obscure, is clearly enough revealed by her secretive purchase of statues of Venus and Apollo and her turning, on the Sabbath, to read a chapter in Gibbon on Julian the Apostate. |
| "If that's not graphic enough, consider the shocking revelation from the Confessional in Corvo's Hadrian the Seventh when the future Pope confesses "that two or three times in my life I have delighted in impure thoughts inspired by some lines in Cicero's Oration for M. Coelius..." |
| "Whew. I'm sweating and have to quit. Later tonight, when no one's looking, (shh) it's Balzac! |
| "P.S. Actually, I rather like finding a point of disagreement. Part of the fun of reading and talking about books is that no two readers read exactly the same book. Who was it, Lichtenstien? that wrote "A book is like a mirror. If a monkey looks in, no apostle will look out." |
My response to Dan was, "Gotta banana?"
Another example of Dan's enthusiasm for 19th century literature (and a good reason for it) came in his comments on and quotations from what I thought was an obscure novel. (See the list of web sites at the end of this section that give lie to that label.) Dan wrote,
| "I haven't run across that much in my reading of late -- then hit the jackpot with a Wilkie Collins novel titled No Name (A.L. Burt, NY Publisher, no publishing date in book but about 1860). |
| "Not a mystery (as Moonstone and Woman in White) but, as ever, well written with interesting characters and a compelling (if not always believable) story. Best of all were the attached (I trust) comments on life, on economics and on philosophy. |
| "[Mr. Clare, an old curmudgeon, referred to in the novel as "the philosopher" is speaking about a new opportunity that has come to his son who has squandered all previous chances.] |
| "I have always maintained that the one important phenomenon presented by modern society is--the enormous prosperity of Fools. Show me an individual Fool, and I will show you an aggregate Society which gives that highly favored personage nine chances out of ten--and grudges the tenth to the wisest man in existence. Look where you will, in every high place there sits an Ass, settled beyond the reach of all the greatest Intellects in this world to pull him down. Over our whole social system, complacent Imbecility rules supreme--snuffs out the searching light of Intelligence with total impunity--and hoots, owl-like, in answer to every form of protest: See how well we all do in the dark! One of these days that audacious assertion will be practically contradicted, and the whole rotten system of modern society will come down with a crash. |
| "'God forbid!' cried Mr. Vanstone, looking about him as if the crash was coming already. |
| "'With a crash!' repeated Mr. Clare. 'There is my theory in a few words. Now for the remarkable application of it, which, this letter suggests. Here is my lout of a boy--' |
| "'You don't mean that Frank has got another chance?' exclaimed Mr. Vanstone. |
|
"'Here is this perfectly hopeless booby, Frank,' pursued the philosopher. 'He has never done anything in his life to help himself, and, as a necessary consequence, Society is in a conspiracy to carry him to the top of the tree. He has hardly had time to throw away that chance you gave him, before this letter comes, and puts the ball at his foot for the second time. My rich cousin (who is intellectually fit to be at the tail of the family, and who is therefore, as a matter of course, at the head of it) has been good enough to remember my existence, and has offered his influence to serve my eldest boy. My rich cousin is a booby who thrives on landed property; he has done something for another booby who thrives on Politics, who knows a third booby who thrives on Commerce, who can do something for a fourth booby, thriving at present on nothing, whose name is Frank. So the mill goes. So the cream of all human rewards is sipped in endless succession by the Fools. I shall pack Frank off to-morrow. In course of time, he'll come back again on our hands, like a bad shilling: more chances will fall in his way, as a necessary consequence of his meritorious imbecility. Years will go on--I may not live to see it, no more may you--it doesn't matter; Frank's future is equally certain either way--put him into the army, the Church, politics, what you please, and let him drift: he'll end in being a general, a bishop, or a minister of state, by dint of the great modern qualification of doing nothing whatsoever to deserve his place.' With this summary of his son's worldly prospects, Mr. Clare tossed the letter contemptuously across the table, and poured himself out another cup of tea." pp. 63-64 |
|
[Musings on entering a poorer section of London]
"In this district, as in other districts remote from the wealthy quarters of the metropolis, the hideous London vagabond--with the filth of the street outmatched in his speech, with the mud of the street out dirtied in his clothes--lounges, lowering and brutal, at the street corner and the gin-shop door--the public disgrace of his country, the unheeded warning of social troubles that are yet to come. Here the loud self-assertion of Modern Progress--which has reformed so much in manners and altered so little in men--meets the flat contradiction that scatters its pretensions to the winds. here while the national prosperity feasts, like another Belshazzar, on the spectacle of its own magnificence, is the Writing on the Wall, which warns the monarch, Money, that his glory is weighed in the balance, and his power is found wanting." |
|
[A family governess musing on the possible futures of the two newly-orphaned girls she is suddenly responsible for]
"Does there exist in every human being, beneath that outward and visible character which is shaped into form by the social influences surrounding us, an inward, invisible disposition, which is part of ourselves, which education may indirectly modify, but can never hope to change? |
| "Is the philosophy which denies this, and asserts that we are born with dispositions like blank sheets of paper, a philosophy which has failed to remark that we are not born with blank faces--a philosophy which has never compared together two infants of a few days old, and has never observed that those infants are not born with blank tempers for mothers and nurses to fill up at will? |
|
"Are there, infinitely varying with each individual, inbred forces of Good and Evil in all of us, deep down below the reach of mortal encouragement and mortal repression--hidden Good and hidden Evil, both alike at the mercy of the liberating opportunity and the sufficient temptation? Within these earthly limits is earthly Circumstance ever the key, and can no human vigilance warn us beforehand of the forces imprisoned in ourselves which that key may unlock?" p. 125 |
Ah, the gems one finds in rare little corners of the literary world. How did Wilkie Collins know about George W. Bush and political debates about welfare limits taking place in 2001?

Reading's Home Page | Title Index | Author Index | Genre Index